- Ati radeon 2400 xt vs 730 full#
- Ati radeon 2400 xt vs 730 pro#
- Ati radeon 2400 xt vs 730 series#
2D accelerator supporting all GDI+ functions. Programmable video processing - pixel processors are used to process the video stream (compression, decompression, and postprocessing tasks). TV-Out and TV-In (the latter requires an interface chips). Supports rendering to floating point format buffers, per component FP16 and FP32 precision. New technique of texture compression, optimized for compressing two-channel normal maps (so called 3Dc, 4:1 compression ratio). Small additional features of vertex shaders, besides the basic 2.0 ones. Additional capabilities of pixel shaders based on the enhanced 2.0 version - so called 2.0.b. Everything necessary to support Pixel and Vertex Shaders 2.0. Capability to change MSAA patterns from frame to frame (Temporal AA) Compression of frame and Z buffers in MSAA modes. MSAA 2x/4x/6x, with flexibly programmed sample patterns. Support for a "double-sided" stencil buffer. Calculating up to 16 depth values per clock in MSAA mode (i.e. 
Ati radeon 2400 xt vs 730 full#
Calculation, blending, and writing of up to 8 full (color, depth, stencil buffer) pixels per clock. 8 pixel processors, each with one texture unit. On-board PCI-Express 16x bus interface (perhaps in future ATI will use a proprietary PCI-Express->AGP 8x bridge to manufacture AGP cards). 128-bit memory interface (dual channel controller) (!). FÑ packaging (flip-chip, without a metal cap). Based on a 110 nm process technology (TMSC, low-k, copper connections). Official RADEON X700XT/PRO (RV410) specification We'll leave forecasts and assumptions at that, and focus on the new product released by the Canadian company, in order to temporarily put aside the AGP market and compare RADEON X700XT with GeForce 6600GT. So ATI will probably have hard times on the AGP market in the $150-250 price segment, especially if NVIDIA releases the AGP version of GeForce 6600, which is quite possible. So, more de-featured versions of 9800 Platinum Edition based on the 128-bit bus will most likely come. This is of small profit, considering the expensive PCB and the 256-bit memory bus. So what is left to ATI is to drop the prices for its old products down to $150 and lower. Ati radeon 2400 xt vs 730 pro#
Our research and measurements demonstrated that ATI is wrong to support RADEON 9800 PRO on the AGP market as an alternative to X700 in the PCI-E segment, because 9800 PRO does not demonstrate proper performance, which will pertain to the new video cards up to 200 USD. Note that it will be easy for NVIDIA (as it already has an HSI bridge, which converts AGP to PCI-E and vice versa) and not so simple for ATI, who does not possess such a bridge. It's appropriate here to remember that the market will finally cross the T's, and the demand may force the manufacturers to listen to users' needs and release the AGP counterparts. You can wax indignant over the behavior of the leading manufacturers, but progress is progress. No matter how you feel about this series, insulting for the AGP segment still covering almost 99% of users.
Ati radeon 2400 xt vs 730 series#
The new series is oriented solely to PCI-Express, so we cannot expect the AGP counterparts in the nearest future (or for good). The X700 series also comprises several video cards, united by the same codename of the chip - RV410. So, not so much time has passed since the release of the NVIDIA GeForce 6600 series, and now ATI is announcing its "Canadian answer". Test results: Return to Castle Wolfenstein.Test results: Serious Sam: The Second Encounter.Synthetic tests in 3DMark03: Pixel Shaders.Synthetic tests in 3DMark03: Vertex Shaders.Synthetic tests in 3DMark03: FillRate Multitexturing.Testbed configurations, benchmarks, 2D quality.
0 kommentar(er)
